�鶹��ý

<p>A new <a href="https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-05-31/pdf/2016-12494.pdf"><u>rule</u> </a>by the Small Business Administration makes several changes to small business contracting regulations. These changes, set to go into effect June 30, are aimed at increasing small-business competition and enabling small businesses to potentially obtain larger contracts without increasing compliance costs.  In April, �鶹��ý <a href="http://newsmanager.commpartners.com/agcleg/downloads/�鶹��ý%20Comments%20on%20SBA%20Performance%20of%20Work%20Prop%20Rule.pdf"><u>submitted comments</u></a> on the proposed rule.</p>

This week, 132 members of the House of Representatives sent a letter to House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady (R-Texas) and Ranking Democrat Sander Levin (Mich.) in support of fixing the Highway Trust Fund as part of comprehensive tax reform. Thanks to the �鶹��ý members who met with their representatives during the TCC Fly-In or contacted their representatives asking them to sign the letter.

<p>On May 25, the House Natural Resources Committee passed legislation that with sensible fiscal reforms—and no taxpayer dollars for a bailout—to address the financial crisis in Puerto Rico. The <a href="http://newsmanager.commpartners.com/agcleg/downloads/2016-05-23%20Puerto%20Rico%20Letter.pdf">�鶹��ý-backed</a> bill would create a debt-restructuring process, empower a federal oversight board to supervise the territory’s fiscal affairs and create a redevelopment authority that will help rebuild Puerto Rico’s infrastructure. As it stands, many Puerto Rican government entities are unable to pay contractors for work completed on government construction projects and the public and private construction markets there remain on life support.</p>

<p>On May 24, �鶹��ý objected to the Department of Defense’s <a href="https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-03-25/pdf/2016-06725.pdf"><u>proposed change</u> </a>to the Defense Federal Acquisition Supplement (DFARS) that would prohibit the use of any cost-plus system of contracting for military construction and military family housing projects governed under Title 10 of the U.S. Code. �鶹��ý noted that a blanket prohibition of the use of a cost-plus system will prevent federal construction owners from selecting the best contracting and project delivery methods to meet the demands of any given construction project.</p>

<p>On May 17, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee unanimously approved �鶹��ý-supported <a href="https://www.congress.gov/114/bills/hr5199/BILLS-114hr5199ih.pdf"><u>legislation</u> </a>that would (1) require civilian federal agencies—non-Department of Defense agencies—to utilize the two-step design-build selection process for design-build projects greater than $3 million, thereby limiting one-step design-build procurements; and (2) help prohibit reverse auctions for certain construction services. Introduced by Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), the bill—H.R. 5199—is nearly identical to the <a href="/news/2016/02/11/agc-backed-procurement-legislation-passes-senate-panel"><u>�鶹��ý-backed legislation</u></a> passed by a Senate Committee in February. �鶹��ý will continue to push for enactment of these procurement reforms.</p>

<p>On May 16, the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Council issued an �鶹��ý-supported <a href="https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-05-16/pdf/2016-11003.pdf"><u>final rule</u></a> that effectively limits the second-step (“short-list”) of the two-step design-build procurement process to no more than five teams. Through <a href="/news/2014/12/05/agc-advances-legislative-priorities-defense-bill"><u>�鶹��ý’s efforts</u></a>, this reform was passed by Congress in 2014. For �鶹��ý’s comments on that proposed rule, click <a href="http://newsmanager.commpartners.com/agcfed/downloads/�鶹��ý%20Comments%20on%20FAR%20Council%20Design%20Build%20Prop.%20Rule.pdf"><u>here</u></a>.</p>

<p>In what may be a 12-round bout, �鶹��ý has scored another victory on the path to expunging President Obama’s <u><a href="/news/2015/08/28/agc-submits-comments-opposing-blacklisting-executive-order">Blacklisting Executive Order</a>.</u> On May 19, the House of Representatives approved legislation that includes an �鶹��ý-backed provision to the National Defense Authorization Act—a bill that has been annually enacted into law for 54 consecutive years—that ensures the EO would not apply to Department of Defense and National Nuclear Security Administration contracts. �鶹��ý will work with Congress to limit the Executive Order.</p>

The House of Representatives today failed—on a vote of 209-216—to pass �鶹��ý-supported legislation that would block further implementation of President Obama’s 2009 executive order encouraging federal agencies to consider government-mandated project labor agreements (PLAs) on construction projects. �鶹��ý, along with other industry allies, urged members of the House to support this initiative and will continue to advocate against government-mandated PLAs.

<p>On May 18, the U.S. Department of Labor released its <a href="https://www.dol.gov/featured/overtime"><u>final rule</u></a> implementing changes to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) overtime regulations.  The most significant change is a doubling of the standard salary threshold for exempt employees – from $455 per week ($23,660 per year) to $913 per week ($47,476 per year).  The rule takes effect on Dec. 1, 2016. In 2015, �鶹��ý sent both <a href="/sites/default/files/Files/Labor%20%26%20HR%20%28public%29/�鶹��ý%20Comments%20to%20Overtime%20NPRM%20-%20Final_2.pdf"><u>individual comments</u></a> and signed onto <a href="/sites/default/files/Files/Labor%20%26%20HR%20%28public%29/PPWO%20Comments%20Overtime_1.pdf"><u>coalition comments</u></a> on the proposed rule. These comments raised strong concerns that the proposed salary threshold of $970 per week ($50,440 per year) would be too large an increase for employers to absorb all at once. While not all of �鶹��ý’s and the coalition’s recommendations were accepted, the final rule does establish a lower salary threshold than originally proposed.  The final rule’s concession for bonuses and commissions and its abstinence from changing the duties test are also consistent with �鶹��ý’s recommendations.</p>

<p>This week, �鶹��ý <a href="http://newsmanager.commpartners.com/agcleg/downloads/2016-04-26%20Senate%20Flake%20Amdt%20USACE%20Funding.pdf"><u>successfully blocked</u></a> legislation that would cut millions of dollars from the Army Corps of Engineers civil works construction program in fiscal year 2017. Sen. Jeff Flake introduced the amendment to the USACE annual funding bill that failed on an <a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=2&vote=00063"><u>84-12</u></a> vote. The Senate continues to consider the USACE funding bill as of publication.</p>